
Chun Koong missile interceptorBy Lee Tae-hoon
Experts raised questions Wednesday about South Korea’s move to counter North Korean ballistic missiles capable of carrying chemical and nuclear warheads by pushing the envisioned development of advanced interceptors.
Seoul successfully developed an indigenous mid-range surface-to-air missile, the Chun Koong, with a maximum range of 40 kilometers in December last year and is planning to inject 135.4 billion won ($120.2 million) to upgrade it to make a longer range surface-to-air missile (L-SAM).
“The country should put more emphasis on proactive deterrence in order to discourage North Korea from provoking the South,” said Kim Tae-woo, a nuclear specialist currently serving as the president of the Korean Institute for National Unification.
“Beefing up defensive measures is necessary but cannot be an effective method of stopping North Korean attacks.”
He said that the country’s limited defense budget should be dedicated to bolstering capabilities to retaliate against the Stalinist regime, which is believed to possess more than 1,000 missiles at over 20 bases throughout the country, if it undertakes a military attack.
The former researcher at the Korean Institute for Defense Analyses argued that the best defense for the South is the ability to undertake an effective offense and that no matter how much money is poured into the missile defense system, the country will remain vulnerable.
“No matter how great the nation’s defense posture is, it cannot stop the North’s motive to undertake an attack against the South, nor completely prevent damage,” he said.
Kim suggested the Ministry of National Defense to increase its outnumbered stockpile of missiles and other conventional arms early last year to a level equivalent or superior to that of the North while serving as a head of a presidential panel on defense advancement.
A senior defense official admitted that the South will remain susceptible to North Korean missile threats, even it successfully develops L-SAMs without a hitch by 2020.
“There is no solution to defending Seoul from North Korean missile attacks,” the official said.
“The odds of intercepting all of the multiple missiles flying toward the South are very slim, no matter how great our missile defense system would be.”
He said the South’s missile defense system is dedicated to defend some of the most valuable military assets, rather than civilians.
Dan Lin, an official of Lockheed Martin specialized in advanced interceptors, concurred, saying the South will suffer a certain degree of damage no matter how early advanced missile interceptors block enemy targets.
“The current technology only allows interceptors to shoot down enemy missiles after the latter reaches an apogee (peak altitude),” he said.
He added that it would be inevitable for the military to shoot down enemy missiles carrying nuclear or chemical warheads when they fly above South Korean territory as many North Korean launch pads are situated near the border.
Lin said his company is consulting with the Defense Acquisition Program Administration over a possible transfer of technology or sales of its most advanced interceptors that employ hit-to-kill technology.
[出処] 北朝鮮核ミサイルも要撃可能だか?|作成者 1004younguk
美軍 ミサイル専門家たちはわが軍が弾道弾を要撃することができる長距離地対空誘導武器(L-SAM)を開発して 2020年全力化に成功すると言っても北朝鮮ミサイルの脅威から自由になることはできないと言った.
北朝鮮の弾道ミサイル 1千余足の中でどれが核またはバイオケミストリー弾頭を搭載したミサイルなのかを区分したり事実上不可能で同時多発的に飛んで来るミサイルらを受け止めることができる技術的, 財政的能力が事実上だめだというのだ.
北朝鮮核ミサイルも要撃可能だか?
北朝鮮が核ミサイルをソウルを含めた主要都市に向けて発射したら要撃が可能だか?
が質問に対してミサイル専門家たちはわが軍が弾道弾を要撃することができる長距離地対空誘導武器(L-SAM)を開発して 2020年全力化に成功すると言っても北朝鮮ミサイルの脅威から自由になることはできないと言った.
北朝鮮の弾道ミサイル 1千余足の中でどれが核またはバイオケミストリー弾頭を搭載したミサイルなのかを区分したり事実上不可能で同時多発的に飛んで来るミサイルらを受け止めることができる技術的, 財政的能力が事実上だめだというのだ.
国内最高核戦略専門家で数えられる統一研究院長ギム・テウ博士は “防御も必要だがもっと重要なことは積極的抑制能力”と指摘した. 彼は費用がたくさんかかりながらも時の挑発意志を抑制するのにあっては限界がある要撃能力を育てるよりは北が攻撃を敢行した時戒めることができる能力を培うのにもっと努力しなければならないと主張した.
中国は数千ヶの核ミサイルを現在保有.
北朝鮮傀儡の核ミサイル推正するおおよそ 48期.
韓国の数十満開の巡航弾道ミサイル保有.
実は日本人たちは空母, イジズすることを誇るが.
それらはもう紙盃に転落されてから長いですね.
上のミサイルが 東京, 大阪などの大都市にツーしたら.
その瞬間地球で消されますね.