Hyundaiは最低（EPA燃費 海外のデータ）
Honda seems to have reported highly conservative EPA MPG numbers for our CR-Zs and we all know how the press has roasted the CR-Z because of our "bad" EPA MPG numbers. Other makers seem to be getting a lot of sales traction by reporting 40 MPG numbers for their cars. I decided to use the real world Fuelly database to see how it all adds up.
I used a recent Motor Trend web site to identify 2011 cars reported to get 40 MPG (either city or hwy). I then used Fuelly to extract the real world MPG. I figure Fuelly users probably care more about MPG, they are using Fuelly after all, and are thus driving somewhat conservatively. Because of the way Fuelly groups cars I couldn"t always exact numbers so I left out those 2011 models (e.g. the Chevy Cruze eco). Here is the result.
The "Over Cmbnd" and the "Over MAX" columns are color coded to show which cars get better real-world MPG than reported by the EPA. Green means better; pink mean worse. The only two cars that get better in "Combined" and "MAX of City/Hwy" are the Honda Insight and our Honda CR-Z. Thus it can be said that Honda reports conservative numbers. The Prius EPA numbers are slightly overstated; but the Prius still gets the best overall MPG. The Hyundai numbers are notably bad.
http://www.crzforum.com/forum/honda-cr-z-mpg/8800-cr-z-mpg-versus-40-mpg-models.html
左3つがカタログ燃費
4つ目が実際の燃費
ヒュンダイはカタログ燃費を盛りつけてるな...( ﾟдﾟ)
