듰뜎빒돸듡뚹븫뱷똶럱뿿
URL: http://www.mct.go.kr/open_content/administrative/administrative/statistics_view.jsp
HWP 긲@귽깑뢁^럱뿿
듰뜎 19-24띘뭞빟뗉릆궻뤶 175.5cm(2004)
듰뜎 19-24띘룛빟뗉릆궻뤶 161.6cm(2004
볷{ 17띘뭞빟뗉릆궻뤶 170.85cm (2004)
볷{ 17띘룛빟뗉릆궻뤶 158.15cm(2004)
볷{ 20-24띘뭞빟뗉릆궻뤶 172.15cm(2004)
볷{ 20-24띘룛빟뗉릆궻뤶 158.71cm(2004)
몟뜃 :
듰뜎 19-24띘뭞빟뗉릆궻뤶 175.5cm(2004)
듰뜎 17띘뭞빟뗉릆궻뤶 173.6cm (2004)
볷{ 20-24띘뭞빟뗉릆궻뤶 172.15cm(2004)
볷{ 17띘뭞빟뗉릆궻뤶 170.85cm (2004)
듰뜎 19-24띘룛빟뗉릆궻뤶 161.6cm(2004)
듰뜎 17띘룛빟뗉릆궻뤶 161.1cm(2004)
볷{ 20-24띘룛빟뗉릆궻뤶 158.71cm(2004)
볷{ 17띘룛빟뗉릆궻뤶 158.15cm(2004)
궩귢궳댱댝귩벦궫궔궯궫궻궬.
궢궔궢뙸렳궼
http://www.altp enis.com/p enis_news/global_p enis_size_survey.shtml
<<<< JAP궕롥뮗궥귡뙱빒 (altp enis,p enis,p enis_ : 뭁뚭궼븊궚궲
둴봃궢궲궘궬궠궋)
궢궔궢
The survey covers 15 countries with the results pulled from sources such as the Journal of S exology in Japan, the Jacobus Survey in India and the Clinic for Men in Chile.
<<<듰뜎궻맜딇럱뿿귩볷{궻 the Journal of S exology in Japan 랦럮됵롊궳믯떉궢궫귝궎궳궥궺.
뷭{뢜뭖, 뷭{뚮뜼, 긨[갋긫깏깄[궼둊믯렑궠귢궲궋궶궋궳, 뫜궻뜎뜎뼬궻 긻긦긛묈궖궠귩귦궕귏귏믯떉궢궫귝궎궳궥궺.k
뜎볙둾뢱럱뿿
A study on the penile size was made on 702 Korean male of In-patients and Out-patients to the department of Urology, Capital Military Hospital, during the period from May 1, to July 31, 1971. The patient`s ages were ranged from 21 to 31. The length of the pen-is was measured from the symphysis pubis to the apex of the pen-is with a tape measure and following results were obtained. 1. The mean length of the pen-is in a non-erected state was 8.0cm., and in a erected state was 12.7 cm. The average ratios erected length/non-erected length of the pen-is were 1.9 in a small sized group and 1.4 in a large sized group. 2. The mean circumference of the pen-is in a non-erected state was 8. 1 cm., and in a erected state was 11.0 cm. The average ratios erected circumference/non-erected circumference of the pen-is were 1.5 in a small sized group and 1.2 in a large sized group. 3. A slight correlation can be seen between the mean length and circumference of the pen-is. In a non-erected state, the mean of length and circumference of the pen-is were equaled and in an erected state, the mean of length of the pen-is was slightly large than the mean of circumference of the pen-is.
뮊롌 {뱰궸뜝^
룋뫌 뜎똓롵뱒뱷뜃뷲@붷볾딇됆
묋뽞 듰뜎뭞맜궻 덦똲 묈궖궠궸듫궥귡듡@
뢯붎륃뺪 묈듰붷볾딇됆둾됵궬 1971 Dec 012(04): 401-404.
Purpose: The penile augmentation operation is getting popular in Korea, but we don`t have enough data about normal penile length distribution of Korean male and their self-esteem about their penile size. So I investigated the flaccid and erect penile sizes of young Korean males and their penile size complex or pride if any. This study data could be a step stone to establish better operation indication and patient consultation.
Results: Total number of study subject who can get sufficient erection is 156 among 171 subjects. In 156 subjects, mean flaccid length, flaccid circumference, erect length and erect circumference were 6.1}1.3cm, 8.9}0.8cm, 10.8}1.3cm and 11.3}1.2cm(Table 1). Mean stretched length was 9.6}1.2cm and the stretched length most closely correlated with the erect length(r=0.81)(Table 2). Mean fat pad depth was 1.1}0.4cm and mean functional penile length, the sum of erect length and fat pad depth, was 11.9}1.3cm. In 156 subjects, the answer about penile size were 7(4.5%) `very small`, 32(20.5%) `small`, 110(70.5%) `normal`, 7(4.5%) `large`, and no `very large`(Table 3). And most of them compared their penile size with others at rest room or rocker room.
궇궻믦뽜깛긲@깛`긅깑
땷궻뭷뜎똓N둇뷲@붷볾딇됆
묋뽞 20묇듰뜎뭞맜궻 덦똲 묈궖궠궴궩귢궸뫮궥귡렔빁궻봃렞궸뫮궥귡뙟땰
뢯붎륃뺪 묈듰붷볾딇됆둾됵궬 1999 Aug 040(08): 1037-1042.
Purpose: Is there any relationship between penile size and physical stature? This study was performed to answer this question and provide guidelines of penile size to assist in counseling patients for penile augmentation. Materials and Methods: Penile size, body weight and height were measured in 150 young healthy men, and the body mass index(BMI) was calculated in weight(kg)/height(m)2. The penile length and circumference were measured with tape in flaccid and erect states. The `lengthening ratio` was calculated by `erect length/flaccid length`, and `tumescent ratio` was calculated by `erect circumference/flaccid circumference`. All the data was statistically evaluated and the following results were obtained. Results: The average length and circumference were 8.26}1.07cm and 8.34}1.03cm respectively in the flaccid state, and 13.42}1.38cm and 11.17}1.05cm in the erect state. The average lengthening and tumescent ratios were 1.64}0.22 and 1.35}0.08, and were negatively correlated to the flaccid penile length and circumference. Height was positively correlated to erect penile length and lengthening ratio. There was a relationship between body weight and erect penile length in a positive direction, but with other penile parameters there were none. There was no relationship between BMI and any parameters of penile size. However, the erect penile length of the normal BMI group was longer than that of the lower BMI group. Conclusions: The results show that the flaccid penile size is related to the erect penile size and there is some relation between penile size and physical stature. We believe these results will be applicable to the penile augmentation.
궇궻믦뽜깇깛]깛긐궳궼, 귽긎깑긼*, 듔릶
땷궻뭷뮝멞묈둾뛝덀됆묈둾붷볾딇됆둾떝렭, 둇볦몟뜃뷲@붷볾딇됆*
묋뽞묈둾맯궻릆궻뤶땩귂뫬뢣궴덦똲묈궖궠궴궻듫쁀맜
뢯붎륃뺪묈듰붷볾딇됆둾됵궬 1998 Nov 039(11): 1061-1064.
뤵딯 _빒궻뢯룉 : 묈듰붷볾딇됆둾됵@http://www.urology.or.kr/
|뽷:
럡궫궭궼륡갲궶뜎궫궭궻 럱뿿귩{궢뢯궥궞궴궕궳궖궶궔궯궫궢, 궞궻뽦묋궸
묈둇쁞궥릐갲귖{궥궞궴궕궳궖궶궔궯궫궳궥.
긙긿[긥깑궻귝궎궶럱뿿궫궭궕궞궻뙅됈궻뢯룉궳궢궫.
|뽷
궕럱뿿궼 볷{궻긙긿[긥깑궴 귽깛긤, `깏궻
긏깏긦긞긏궔귞 뢜귕귞귢궫뙅됈궳궥.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
듰뜎궻뮧뜽럱뿿궻덇븫
V. 뙅_
1. 뮧뜽뫮뤭롌궻빟뗉봏쀮궼 26.8}4.7 띘, 빟뗉릆궻뤶궼 173}4.7 cm, 빟뗉뫬뢣궼 66.1}8.3 kg 덙궖똯궋궬.
2. 븕뭝덦똲붺륉뫴궼뺧똲(뺧똲: Phimosis) 귏궫궼됛뮮뺧붺(됡뮮뺧붺:Reduntant prepuce)궕 6.7% 궳궇궯궫궢, 덦똲딻벆궕덇븫뙥궑귡뤾뜃궕 10.9%, 덦똲딻벆궻쁈뢯궢궫뤾뜃궼 82.4%궬궯궫.
3. 덦똲뮮궠궼띍룷 97mm궳띍묈 176 mm귏궳듡@궠귢궫궢빟뗉뮮궠궼 126.6}13.4 mm 궬궯궫궢봏쀮똓빶덦똲뮮궠궼뱷똶밒궸뿯댰궢귺깛귺긞_. 덦똲딻벆먩[븫궳덦똲딻벆듩(벺뢯븫빁)귏궳궻뮮궠궼 29 mm, 덦똲딻벆듩궳덦똲딻벆-긂긎깈깛긐`긃먝륢뭤_귏궳궕 4.3 mm, 긂긎깈깛긐`긃뮮궠궼 93mm 궳궇귟둫븫댧빶긘긃귺궼궩귢궪귢 23.0%, 3.5%, 73.5%궳뮧뜽궠귢궫.
4. 덦똲딻벆븫빁궻빟뗉귏귦귟궼 113,3}11.3 mm, 덦똲딈믨븫궼 112.8}11.4 mm, 덦똲딻벆-긂긎깈깛긐`긃먝뜃븫궼 107.5}10.0 mm궬궯궫. 빟뗉귏귦귟궼봏쀮똍듩궸뱷똶밒궸뿯댰궢궫롎궕궶궔궯궫.
5. 덦똲딻벆귏귦귟궕덦똲딈믨븫귏귦귟귝귟묈궖궋뤾뜃궕멣뫬뫮뤭롌궻 57.4 궳궇귟, 궩궻뵿뫮궻뤾뜃궼 42.6% 궳궇궯궫. 덦똲귏귦귟 3뙿뭤_궻뫇믦궥귡궻귩딈궳묈궖궠룈궸뗦빁궢궲뙥귢궽멣뫬뫮뤭롌궻 38.9%궕 [덦똲딻벆듩 > 덦똲딈믨븫 > 긂긎깈깛긐`긃]궻`뫴귩뙥궧궫궢, 귏귦귟궻묈궖궠롨룈궕 [덦똲딈믨븫 > 덦똲딻벆듩 >긂긎깈깛긐`긃]궻`뫴귩뙥궧궫뤾뜃궼 25.3%궬궯궫.
