1953 빫뜎뼮뮮뒸 : 깋긚긏룕듗궻귺긽깏긇뿧뤾(볺뤾)궼 SF륆뽵뱰롊렔뢣덇궰궻댰뙥
"[The] Department [is] aware of peace treaty determinations and US administrative decisions which would lead [the] Japanese [to] expect us to act in their [favor] in any dispute with [the] ROK over [the] sovereignty [of] Takeshima.
However to [the] best of our knowledge [a] formal statement [of the] US position to [the] ROK in [the] Rusk note [of] August 10, 1951 has not...been communicated [to the] Japanese. [The] Department believes [that it] may be advisable or necessary at sometime [to] inform [the] Japanese Government [regarding the] US position on Takeshima.
[The] Difficulty [at] this point is [the] question of timing as we do not...wish to add another issue to [the] already difficult ROK-Japan negotiations or involve ourselves further than necessary in their controversies, especialy in light [of] many current issues [that are] pending with [the] ROK."
It does not...necessarily follow [that the] US [is] automatically responsible for settling or intervening in Japan걣s international disputes, territorial or otherwise, arising from the peace treaty.
[The] US view re Takeshima [is] simply that of one of many signatories to [the] treaty."
" The U.S. is not obligated to "protect Japan" from Korean "pretensions" to Dokdo, and that such an idea cannot...be considered as [a] legitimate claim for US action under [the U.S.-Japan] security treaty."
---------------------------------------------------------------
1953. 12. 09 귺긽깏긇뜎뼮뮮뒸_깋긚,
뾴뽵궥귢궽
"귺긽깏긇궼벲뱡궸뫮궥귡볷{궻뿧뤾(볺뤾)귩깋긚긏룕듗귩믅궣궲럛렃궥귡궴궋궎뿧뤾귩듰뜎궸뼻귞궔궸궢궫럷궕궇귡. 궢궔궢, 궩귢궼 (긖깛긲깋깛긘긚긓륆뽵궸긖귽깛궢궫뫝궘궻뱰럷롌궻뭷궳덇궰궻뿧뤾(볺뤾)궳궇귡궬궚궬. 궩궢궲, |뱡(벲뱡)뽦묋궸뫮궥귡듰뜎궴볷{궴궻빐몚궳귺긽깏긇궼궞귢댥뤵듫^궢궶궋"
