えー、
アメリカのスタンフォード大学で、中国、日本、韓国、台湾、アメリカの
歴史教科書を比較し、その分析結果が発表された論文がありました
ので、ご紹介しましょう。
http://iis-db.stanford.edu/res/2260/Divided-Memory_In-house_2008.pdf
こちらの資料で、Ｐ４４を開くと、以下のような記述があります。
Japanese Textbooks: History Without a Story?
In contrast to American and Chinese textbooks Japanese history textbooks offer no strong narrative about the war. This is surprising given that many different war stories circulate in Japan’s public discourse and popular culture: as a war of aggression that did great damage to the peoples; as a war for the liberation of Asia from Western colonialism; as a war fought by heroic but doomed soldiers; as a war that the Japanese people themselves “victims”; and so forth. None of these stories find their way into the Japanese textbooks in undiluted form. Compared to the American and Chinese history textbooks their tone is muted, neutral, and almost bland. Perhaps it is this affectless neutrality that so infuriates not only the Japanese right-wing but also Chinese and Korean critics. The Japanese history textbooks do not tell the stories that they want to hear—or are used to hearing.
日本の教科書は、愛国心を煽ることもなく、中立的で、
戦争は賛美していないんだとよｗ
ちなみにこれは、戦時中敵国だった、アメリカの一流大学での
分析だと言うことも忘れるなよ？ｗ
なあ、朝鮮人？ｗ 日本人が言ったとおりだっただろ？ｗ
事実はいつも、朝鮮人に、あまりにも冷酷だよな？ｗ
