日本の教科書が気に入らない朝鮮人にｗ

네―,

미국의 스탠포드 대학에서, 중국, 일본, 한국, 대만, 미국의

역사 교과서를 비교해, 그 만큼석결과가 발표된 논문이 있었습니다

의로,소개합시다.

http://iis-db.stanford.edu/res/2260/Divided-Memory_In-house_2008.pdf

이쪽의 자료로, P44를 열면, 이하와 같은 기술이 있습니다.

Japanese Textbooks: History Without a Story?
In contrast to American and Chinese textbooks Japanese history textbooks offer no strong narrative about the war. This is surprising given that many different war stories circulate in Japan’s public discourse and popular culture: as a war of aggression that did great damage to the peoples; as a war for the liberation of Asia from Western colonialism; as a war fought by heroic but doomed soldiers; as a war that the Japanese people themselves “victims”; and so forth. None of these stories find their way into the Japanese textbooks in undiluted form. Compared to the American and Chinese history textbooks their tone is muted, neutral, and almost bland. Perhaps it is this affectless neutrality that so infuriates not only the Japanese right-wing but also Chinese and Korean critics. The Japanese history textbooks do not tell the stories that they want to hear—or are used to hearing.

일본의 교과서는, 애국심을 부추길 것도 없고, 중립적으로,

전쟁은 찬미 하고 있지 않는다와w

덧붙여서 이것은, 전시중 적국이었다, 미국의 일류 대학에서의

분석이라고 말하는 일도 잊지 마？w

, 조선인？w　일본인이 말했던 대로였다이겠지？w

사실은 언제나, 조선인에, 너무 냉혹해？w